Similarly, you magnify the importance of what you intend to defend through this phenomenon.Īnother way to interpret this fallacy, in terms of information selection, is by ignoring the differences that may exist in your data while emphasizing similarities. They can also manipulate or tweak the information in order to convince someone (or themselves) about something. Selective informationĪs you can see, people can devalue information that’s inconsistent with their ideas through the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. In this case, you would ignore the celestial bodies that could distort the figure you’re looking for. Your culture taught you to draw a succession of imaginary lines to link the stars and form figures when, in reality, their position is determined by chance. In other words, you manipulate the data to confirm your hypothesis.Īnother example of this fallacy is the interpretation of star constellations. This fallacy would indicate you had a premonitory dream as 3 + 6 – 2 = 7 and this was the number you dreamed of. Imagine that you dream of the number seven while you stayed in hotel room number 362 (of which you were previously unaware of). To continue understanding the Texas sharpshooter fallacy, here’s an example you could easily find in your daily life. Examples of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy Thus, according to this fallacy, someone modifies observable data in order to confirm their hypotheses (just like the shooter in the story did). In other words, he altered the data (painted the targets) to confirm his hypothesis (he was a sharpshooter). Later, he painted a target centered on each one of them and proclaims himself a sharpshooter.”Īs you can see, the shooter took the necessary measures to make his action seem logical in order to prove his worth. “There was a shooter who randomly fired several shots at a barn.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |